Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6D67974 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49386 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 22:19:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49321 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 22:19:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49312 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2011 22:19:16 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:19:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO fc14x86v0.jboss.hr) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mturk, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:19:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4EF25B61.50003@apache.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:19:13 +0100 From: Mladen Turk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111214 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Move to Maven? (WAS: Re: Publishing process for JARs for Maven Central) References: <4EEDA65A.9040905@apache.org> <4EEF7067.7050609@pidster.com> <4EEF73A9.8040009@apache.org> <4EEF807B.2030709@apache.org> <4EF07258.7050106@apache.org> <4EF24DEC.6030508@apache.org> <4EF24E8D.7050702@apache.org> <4EF25641.8090605@apache.org> <4EF2572C.4040103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4EF2572C.4040103@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/21/2011 11:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/12/2011 21:57, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> In essence no packages will be able to change the version >> unless he rewrites the .spec or debian files from scratch thought. > > Ouch. That is argument for only doing this in trunk, if we do it at all. Right. Up till now all linux distributions were using tomcatX, so yes, Tomcat8 (trunk) is the logical target. > Still need to figure out how to merge patches if we go that way. > If they do not span across new 'modules' it should be just making sure they are executed using 'patch -pX' so that correct number of directory entries is stripped from patch header. Regards -- ^TM --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org