Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81CFD7EDA for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57995 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2011 07:08:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 57719 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2011 07:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 57685 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2011 07:08:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:08:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:07:59 +0000 Received: by wwf27 with SMTP id 27so2890786wwf.0 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:07:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=96BT5U4t5OlB0B+DoHUzCeJE+37ZBMnr71DY7KJEE3Q=; b=IRxXfObnxV6LjZK73lpnyKVGbPJt1jOfbMJYaeZm84uL0BJixibD7h/llpyoJP7mmR SfnFwV7qSSJ4Lx8k/7xOtcYWCZTxrwDCqcJOiMvDYFzOEchbYoCmQAGlkUREF9wKY4/5 4CGzOh/X5bsKVTuQsGMFxEHZ0S3D3uZkUuaUk= Received: by 10.216.189.82 with SMTP id b60mr1137819wen.23.1318576058899; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (132.Red-79-148-52.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [79.148.52.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n21sm12503378wbp.2.2011.10.14.00.07.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E97DFB7.50005@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0200 From: jean-frederic clere User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Publishing zips to the maven repo References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote: > We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing the Tomcat zips to a maven repo in svn. Not the best idea to have them in svn, so we're trying to get them in the actual maven repo. > > It's pretty slick to be able to use the maven dependency plugin to download and unpack the zip so you can run integration tests and things like that. Arquillian does that. Or do like we do and download& unpack with the dependency plugin, then add some wars& zip up again with the maven assembly plugin. > > The current plan is to continue using the org.apache.openejb groupId. Do we (Tomcat) want to publish them ourselves in the org.apache.tomcat section of the repo? We already have a bunch of sources/binaries in the maven repo can't you build using it? - In other words what is missing or wrong? - Cheers Jean-Frederic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org