Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C40A9BEF for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17611 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2011 12:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2011 12:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17345 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2011 12:18:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knst.kolinko@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vx0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:18:46 +0000 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so5525382vcb.18 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AaMSsIJh898mVZhNu+QuDjkijsIHZSJdHLSWA6s3lIU=; b=Ul4sDRn0G0FAlIWBwy862p2rSrAET/IMGO8XtYshEJdyod3MG+l5yy2YlzoRayFry2 S32HleGwU5dnK1h6owZgu2kzwLEtofmyv6TQgHfYvLCxmKpnFV6MKRsCqVnAkN1HBSFp mQOoE9oEAiN7zbAqpD0CCgL5QPNsz0mrxkRfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.172.203 with SMTP id be11mr8060686vdc.67.1317125905988; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.183.193 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:18:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110927101815.020A314DDE3@vmgump.apache.org> References: <20110927101815.020A314DDE3@vmgump.apache.org> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:18:25 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-test (in module tomcat-trunk) failed From: Konstantin Kolinko To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2011/9/27 Bill Barker : > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, > and/or contact the folk at general@gump.apache.org. > > Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integratio= n. > This issue affects 1 projects, > =A0and has been outstanding for 8 runs. > The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'= . > For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: > =A0 =A0- tomcat-trunk-test : =A0Tomcat 8.x, a web server implementing Jav= a Servlet 3.1, > =A0 =A0... > > > Full details are available at: > =A0 =A0http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/tomcat-trunk/tomcat-trunk-tes= t/index.html > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.298 sec [junit] Test org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival FAILED =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D TEST-org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.BIO.txt= : Testcase: testMemberArrival took 4.277 sec FAILED Checking member arrival length expected:<9> but was:<19> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Checking member arrival length expected:<9> but was:<19> at org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.testMemb= erArrival(TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.java:77) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D TEST-org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.NIO.txt Testcase: testMemberArrival took 4.262 sec =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I think it is some timing issue, because NIO test succeeded and IIRC this test does not depend on connector implementation. (Still 9 vs 19 sounds like a big difference). Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org