Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1B9A77C5 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96508 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2011 18:33:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 96292 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2011 18:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 96283 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2011 18:33:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:33:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:33:23 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id F6Wp1h00A17dt5G566Z2cz; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:33:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([69.143.109.145]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id F6Z11h00438FjT13Z6Z1xp; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:33:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4E36F159.6090305@christopherschultz.net> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:32:57 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Servlet 3.1, Tomcat 8 etc. References: <4E2EF9D2.7020805@apache.org> <4E36CA1A.1010209@christopherschultz.net> <4E36CEC5.1010908@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4E36CEC5.1010908@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig03F185E1EF12B2EA6B187177" --------------enig03F185E1EF12B2EA6B187177 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, On 8/1/2011 12:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 01/08/2011 16:45, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Mark, >> >> On 7/26/2011 1:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> The Servlet EG is starting to discuss changes to the Servlet API >>> for 3.1. It would be useful if the option existed to implement some >>> of these changes in Tomcat trunk. The benefits of this are: - we >>> can see how feasible the API changes are to implement - users can >>> try out the new APIs (assuming we do a Tomcat 8 alpha release) >> >> How much of this stuff could reasonably be built-into Tomcat 7 >> without breaking anything? >=20 > None. The TCK will fail as soon as any changes are made to the API. Ooh, so until the TCK is updated to tolerate Servlet 3.1, we will be unable to run TCK tests against trunk. That seems ... non-ideal. -chris --------------enig03F185E1EF12B2EA6B187177 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk428VwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDsdQCfcglYCwU78gET0LR5B/+4LGCx y7EAoMJLtzxfQ7yYRLLEGMRFhrxhXcwn =Y7Bd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig03F185E1EF12B2EA6B187177--