Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of theflycloud@126.com
 designates 220.181.15.84 as permitted sender)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:34:05 +0800 (CST)
From: =?GBK?B?0rbDrw==?= <theflycloud@126.com>
To: tomcat-dev-mlist <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Message-ID: <13efcde.51e3.131cd6f4160.Coremail.theflycloud@126.com>
Subject: is this acceptor threadsafe?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_68039_27289432.1313411645792"

------=_Part_68039_27289432.1313411645792
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 /**
     * Server socket acceptor thread.
     */
    protected class Acceptor implements Runnable {
        /**
         * The background thread that listens for incoming TCP/IP connections and
         * hands them off to an appropriate processor.
         */
        public void run() {
            // Loop until we receive a shutdown command
            while (running) {
                // Loop if endpoint is paused
                while (paused) {
                    try {
                        Thread.sleep(1000);
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                        // Ignore
                    }
                }
                try {
                    // Accept the next incoming connection from the server socket
                    SocketChannel socket = serverSock.accept();
if we have more than 1 acceptors,will the statement of "serverSock.accept()" be theadsafe?

 
------=_Part_68039_27289432.1313411645792--