Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B962666E5 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30875 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2011 10:56:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30509 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2011 10:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30498 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2011 10:56:40 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:56:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO s2laptop.local) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4E198566.3030701@apache.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:56:38 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Preparing for a 7.0.19 tag Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just a quick summary of the regressions reported against 7.0.18 and other issues that need to be fixed before 7.0.19 is tagged. 7.0.17 / 7.0.18 regressions - IPv6 broken - fixed - no test case (nice to have but not essential for 7.0.19) - AJP 400 errors - fixed - no test case (nice to have but not essential for 7.0.19) - AJP keep-alive broken - not fixed - no test case (nice to have but not essential for 7.0.19) - Open bugs - 51490 - 51494 - Unit tests - Comet failures - Need more info from Rainer to determine if this is a regression - TCK - Servlet TCK failure - I saw a failure with mod_proxy_ajp & NIO yesterday need to investigate Didn't appear to be related to AJP issues above Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org