Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 247F86D6C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12954 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 16:36:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12896 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 16:36:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12887 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 16:36:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:36:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username funkman, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:36:41 +0000 Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so7096224iwl.18 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:36:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.116.3 with SMTP id k3mr8480397ibq.101.1306946200403; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.68 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:36:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE65AD8.2090807@christopherschultz.net> References: <4DE55433.1080304@christopherschultz.net> <4DE5FF10.9040606@apache.org> <4DE65AD8.2090807@christopherschultz.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:36:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Outdated Servlet 3.0 Javadocs available on tomcat.apache.org From: Tim Funk To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163692030c03fee904a4a920e9 --00163692030c03fee904a4a920e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Doh - Older specs had the javadocs. I never scrolled to the end to notice it missing from the current spec. -Tim On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Schultz < chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Tim, > > On 6/1/2011 8:35 AM, Tim Funk wrote: > > Is the PDF of the spec which is downloadable up to date with respect to > > comments? > > The version of the PDF I'm looking at (3.0 Final, 1434610 bytes, dated > 10 December 2009) does not include the javadoc at all... it does include > some documentation of certain methods... I have only done a casual > reading at this point. > --00163692030c03fee904a4a920e9--