Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A13214F78 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82077 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 82020 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 82011 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 14:52:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:52:21 +0000 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zSrd1g0030cZkys51Ss05F; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:52:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([69.143.109.145]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zSry1g01238FjT13WSrz3x; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:51:59 +0000 Message-ID: <4E03530C.8090707@christopherschultz.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:51:56 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Supporting more general globs in loader definition? References: <4E034EE2.5080903@kippdata.de> <4E035034.4080402@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <4E035034.4080402@kippdata.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2a1pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB8B3882A954C6FA2E481AC92" --------------enigB8B3882A954C6FA2E481AC92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rainer, On 6/23/2011 10:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Globs in the file name and not > the directory part is the most important use case and easy to understan= d > in its consequences. So I lean towards this type of improvement right n= ow. So: /path/to/*.jar (allowed today) /path/to/foo*.jar (proposed) /path/*/foo.jar (not proposed) /path/**/foo.jar (ant-style "**" for "any depth", not proposed) ? Any reason not to allow globs in the non-filename path portion? I can't really see a use case for actually wanting a path-glob but am interested in your reasoning. -chris --------------enigB8B3882A954C6FA2E481AC92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4DUw4ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBFAQCgjecwYOEFhuknx5gqKxrdcda6 VisAoIb45I7qp1vJ4yruV43t89nNmgJU =nT2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB8B3882A954C6FA2E481AC92--