Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71678 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 15:22:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 15:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 68833 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 15:22:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 68576 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 15:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 68567 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 15:22:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:22:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 71532 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 15:21:48 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.23.9]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:21:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4CD815A7.5030605@apache.org> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:22:15 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log References: <4CD81450.4060200@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <4CD81450.4060200@kippdata.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/11/2010 15:16, Rainer Jung wrote: > A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the > difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the > request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. > > I added a feature to Apache trunk (will become 2.4) to make it > configurable for Apache, which time stamp to choose ([1]). Furthermore > the Apache web server allows to choose the format, in which the time > stamp is being logged as something different than just "Common Log > Format". This is all configured by an appropriate "format" in %{format}t. > > Any a priori objections about porting the same functionality to Tomcat > trunk? None here. I'd find it useful. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org