Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94535 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 17:41:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 17:41:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 17818 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:42:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17619 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:42:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 17610 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 17:42:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:42:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.190] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:42:12 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3602.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 67CF5700018A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:41:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3602.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5BA7B700065B for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:41:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.189.109]) by mwinf3602.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 39B14700018A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:41:52 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20101103174152236.39B14700018A@mwinf3602.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613D5EAA286 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:41:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auLD2iG1nfou for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:41:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from s2laptop.local (unknown [38.110.32.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA13AEAA155 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:41:24 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4CD19EBF.60108@apache.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:41:19 -0400 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Http Coyote Connector References: <4CD19A8F.3040401@autonomy.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD19A8F.3040401@autonomy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/11/2010 13:23, Kailash Kothari wrote: > Hi, > > Im using Tomcat 6.0.x (bundled within JBoss) > > I understand that the Http Coyote connector that binds port 8080 on the > OS is started right at the end in the tomcat startup process after all > webapps have been deployed. > > This is a problem for us because we have one webapp that is deployed > first and then a second webapp that needs to talk to the first webapp in > a startup servlet. > > Since the http connector hasn't been started, the webapps cant talk to > each other until the server has started up completely. > > Is there a design reason that the http connector is started at the end > of boot up rather than earlier? > > I tweaked the source code to start this up earlier and have everything > working as I need, but could this have any side effects? This belongs on the users list. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org