Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20581 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 20:11:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 20:11:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 85568 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 20:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 85208 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 20:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 85194 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 20:11:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:11:12 +0000 Received: from thor.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o92KAohx015604 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:10:50 GMT Received: (from daemon@localhost) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id o92KAoU8015603; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <201010022010.o92KAoU8015603@thor.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49985] Lazy initialization without any synchronization - data race in AstInteger, AstFloatingPoint, AstString X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Tomcat 6 X-Bugzilla-Component: Catalina X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: konstantin.s.serebryany@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@tomcat.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: default X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49985 --- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany 2010-10-02 16:10:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Fixed in trunk (will be in 7.0.3 onwards) and proposed for 6.0.x. > > There are many places were static analysis This is why we use dynamic analysis :) We are experimenting with ThreadSanitizer for Java (search for it if curious). Not something we can offer to users yet, but already 'sort of works for us'. > incorrectly reports thread safety > issues in the Tomcat code base. Bug reports that look like copy and pasted > output from these tools tends to get ignored / resolved as invalid. In this > case it took a close inspection of the EL parser to spot the place where these > objects were cached to confirm this as a potential issue. > > If you have done the analysis that demonstrates that there really is an issue > it saves a lot of time all round if you include that in the initial bug report. Agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org