tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.4
Date Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:03:09 GMT
On 20/10/2010 06:39, Jess Holle wrote:
>  On 10/20/2010 5:45 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 19/10/2010 08:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Ping. Just a gentle reminder that there are ~2 days left for this vote.
>>> So far we have 1 vote for beta and no other votes.
>> Sorry - it should have said ~1 day above. I've been traveling and got my
>> dates mixed up. I'll leave the vote open for another 24 hours or so.
>>
>> Currently there are 4 votes for beta (2*PMC, 1*committer, 1*contributor)
>> so we need at least 1 more PMC vote in order to proceed with this
>> release.
> As someone trying to figure out when to take the plunge into Tomcat 7,
> but needing something that is definitely "stable", is there any sort of
> list as to what hurdles remain to be cleared before considering Tomcat 7
> is considered "stable"?

My own view is that to be considered stable, Tomcat 7 needs to meet the
following criteria:
1. Implement all aspects of Servlet 3.0, JSP 2.2, EL 2.2
2. Pass all unit tests with all three HTTP connectors
4. Pass all relevant TCKs with the security manager enabled
   - Servlet TCK with all three HTTP connectors and both AJP connectors
   - JSP TCK with any connector
   - EL TCK (doesn't use web requests)
4. Have no 'significant' open bugs
5. Have reasonable adoption
6. Have a couple of releases with no 'serious' bugs emerging

In term of progress:
1. Done (to the best of my knowledge).
2. It does.
3. It does (as have all 7.0.x releases).
4. There is currently 1 (yes one!) open bug without a patch across
5.5.x, 6.0.x and 7.0.x so I think we can call this one done.
5. Based on some analysis of download requests and the number and
quality of bug reports I am happy that there is reasonable adoption at
this stage.
6. I see this as the only thing between 7.0.x and stability.

Serious is subjective but the sort of things I would include are:
- anything that requires a major refactoring to fix
- anything that breaks typical use cases

As an example, I would consider another bug 49884 serious due to both
the async issues it caused and the scale of the refactoring required to
fix. I wouldn't consider another 50072 serious mainly because that issue
has been present in the 6.0.x code base and hasn't been a problem (at
least not one folks have reported).

So in summary, if 7.0.4 and 7.0.5 go well, things are looking good for
7.0.6.

HTH,

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message