Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <201008221412.o7MEC8dt026986@thor.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49796] Crash in SSLSocket.handshake()
In-Reply-To: <bug-49796-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49796-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49796

--- Comment #2 from mikew@hyperreal.org 2010-08-22 10:12:05 EDT ---
I just noticed "java.io.IOException: Too many open files" in the Tomcat log. 
So the problem might be that either Tomcat Native or APR is not gracefully
handling a system call failure.

Regarding whether or not this bug is related to Bug 49795, here is how the
situations are similar and different:

Similarities: The 2 systems are running the exact same versions of Java,
Tomcat, Tomcat Native and APR.

Differences: The 2 bugs occurred on 2 different systems, and happened about 2
hours apart. The systems have slightly different Linux kernel versions.  The
systems that exhibited this bug had "java.io.IOException: Too many open files"
in the server log, while the other system did not.  (However, it is conceivable
that the system for Bug 49795 ran out of file descriptors but did not manage to
log that fact.  But I would not assume this.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org