Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 682 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 14:00:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 14:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 62908 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 14:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 62459 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 14:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 62444 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 14:00:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:00:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rainer.jung@kippdata.de designates 195.227.30.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.227.30.149] (HELO mailserver.kippdata.de) (195.227.30.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:00:27 +0000 Received: from [195.227.30.209] (notebook-rj [195.227.30.209]) by mailserver.kippdata.de (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o67E04FR028668 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C34885F.9000104@kippdata.de> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:59:59 +0200 From: Rainer Jung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 5.5.30 Build References: <461E23C1-99D7-47E2-990B-E94053430385@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <461E23C1-99D7-47E2-990B-E94053430385@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 01.07.2010 18:11, Jim Jagielski wrote: > According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the > tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is: > > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable - MD5 OK - Signatures OK - Mostly expected differences between tag and src archives, except: - Did you include build/tomcat-5.5.30-build.txt deliberately, so people can see how your build ran? - Directory apache-tomcat-5.5.30/container/modules/groupcom/build is missing It is needed if one build tc 5.5. with "cluster-ha" set in order to build the new Cluster instead of the old one. I'd say it was mostly experimental for 5.5, so not a showstopper and definitely not a regression Thanks for RMing! Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org