Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58271 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2010 21:32:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2010 21:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 32163 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 21:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31992 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 21:32:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31983 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2010 21:32:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:32:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.191] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:32:11 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0B8B97005332 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F3245700533A for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:30:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.146.198]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C44407005332 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:30:20 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20100614213020804.C44407005332@mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3070F32BFA for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:32:07 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBK-YTooGWQZ for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:32:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from dd3y1d3j.rochestownlodge.local (unknown [62.231.49.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D92D3321C0 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:32:02 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C169F65.9030809@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:30:13 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 as beta References: <4C155875.7080400@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 14/06/2010 14:27, Martin Dubuc wrote: > I have been running RC4 for a couple of days and it seems to be fairly > stable. I would recommend release it as 7.0.0 Beta. > > However, there is an issue with the el. It can't deal with literals, which > will be a problem for all applications using JSF converters. There was a > similar issue when Tomcat 6.0.2. came out. You can go back in the mailing > list archive read message in tomcat-dev Nov. 29, 2006 16:39:21 GMT and > titled "Problem with JSF 1.2 converters in Tomcat 6.0.2": > > http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=116482838430229&w=2 Thanks for the report. The issue has been fixed. > I sent a message to R�my, who handled that issue back then, but haven't got > news back from him. I can't speak for Remy but private messages to developers tend to get ignored. The rule for Tomcat - as it is for all ASF projects - is if it didn't happen on the mailing list then it never happened. Issues should not be raised directly with individual committers but with the community as a whole either directly on the dev list or better still as a Bugzilla entry. > I know we discussed el licensing a while back on the list. Hopefully it will > not be a problem modifying that code. Huh? I have no idea what you are referring to here. Tomcat's EL implementation is - and always has been - ALv2 licensed. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org