Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98209 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 05:11:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 05:11:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 12636 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 05:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12502 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 05:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12485 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 05:11:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1474.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_FRT_STOCK2 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:11:30 +0000 Received: from thor.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o575B9hq008521 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 05:11:09 GMT Received: (from daemon@localhost) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id o575B9AQ008520; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 01:11:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 01:11:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <201006070511.o575B9AQ008520@thor.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49095] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint.unlockAccept does not wakeup accepts with deferred accept or BSD filters X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Tomcat 6 X-Bugzilla-Component: Connectors X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: knst.kolinko@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@tomcat.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: default X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-06-07 01:11:05 EDT --- Fixed in 6.0 in r952090 and will be in 6.0.27 onwards. Note, that all the affected lines are guarded by if(deferAccept) clauses. It is easy to remove that clause and extend this implementation of unlockAccept() that sends a valid "OPTIONS" request upon other connector implementations. Is it worth doing? Regarding the 'BSD filters': apparently the documentation on them is here: [1], [2] [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accept_filter&sektion=9 [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=setsockopt&sektion=2 (see SO_ACCEPTFILTER) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org