Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.222.193 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=pCpPqA2E86QZtYYv/F3WwsseZSk2uaSuAe551tpsyLr96rk0qWBc4bdAmV22mFPntm
         wO0keGIf0qII1uGT9sYkD95AKGTrX2pLMZiVS5ReIhERR44/i4PW575chSW7jOxStGnY
         fM3lbzoTgFVdvyyuk0Qa3WEqWWYVwxwZKwU9c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilfH9OF8gsd3dfVdLnVaW-gKo-OBYnccEIRtw8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4BF3D8AA.4090403@apache.org>
	 <AANLkTilfH9OF8gsd3dfVdLnVaW-gKo-OBYnccEIRtw8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:59:25 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikzib3dZ7QDo0c1NRqV7NT6LHbCX-hZ2_EEDzis@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules
From: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b1d66397d20486f56162

--00504502b1d66397d20486f56162
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

IMHO we should use the modules/ directory as a place to move stuff out
of tomcat 'core', or develop stuff that is optional and only benefits a
subset
of users. They can be included in a "tomcat-all" or "extra" download if
ready,
but they should be released independently.

Tags are pretty cheap - not sure what's the problem on having the modules
tagged when releases are made, and you can tag only the module when its
ready for a standalone release.

Costin

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
<knst.kolinko@gmail.com>wrote:

> What are the release plans for "bayeux", "jdbc-pool", "tomcat-lite"?
>
> Will they be separate components with their own lifecycle and
> versioning? Certainly "jdbc-pool" is mature and can be moved like
> that.
>
> Will we do the same for "bayeux" and "tomcat-lite"? IIRC there were
> thoughts to include "tomcat-lite" as an "extra" into regular TC
> releases, but I do not think that will happen right now.
>
>
> I do not mind the /modules being present on /trunk,
> but I think that we do not need them in /tc7.0.x/tags and in
> /tc7.0.x/trunk branch.
>
>
> 2010/5/19 Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>:
> > [x]  0 Move them, leave them. Don't mind.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

--00504502b1d66397d20486f56162--