Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20388 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2010 09:34:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2010 09:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 85149 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2010 09:34:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 85048 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2010 09:34:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 85037 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2010 09:34:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:34:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.221.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:34:25 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so336422qyk.12 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:34:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LXq16YWtlfSTsKxEZShh57e8CEHk7LcJ1+wViJKy+uA=; b=aITgcZs5ncAcfguS3b+4XUtx/g+HGvBnzTwzN2HBG3SAEEH0c5VhBVIQok6NkZbe8i IV/+LOpR53Drm24S4QPvLv4iE5l7PPHW8rBTTCufQmttYsLMVA1F0yWFgt61d6xTzEGT 81eePso93n025QYJ33x+HQMnCuGsFMcZJ/N/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tege6wF6HW7mMZkEx9ubMinobVeNlhA7acd4TePpxl+IJldJV+7D1F6JrbC111SEOi yVgNirv3a/PGbuYPt8+h3m+bt5uZqzWQb+zUJlklBPey2dvaDbf17EcfBddsZivNJaiX AYYp7Qy08xqHil9fjarXGLp+90yD2/cDV9wPA= Received: by 10.224.87.34 with SMTP id u34mr2055895qal.222.1263548044179; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:34:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.33? ([193.153.229.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm4362496qwk.31.2010.01.15.01.34.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:34:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B503679.3020406@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:33:45 +0100 From: jean-frederic clere User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: JSP 2.2 & EL 2.2 implementation complete References: <4B4F9F1A.8090807@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B4F9F1A.8090807@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 01/14/2010 11:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The subject says it all really. Still no sign of the TCK so there are > probably some bugs in my understanding/interpretation of the spec. According to my tests: EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later). JSP : 1 failures. (the signature tests). Cheers Jean-Frederic > > Mark > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org