Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46714 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2009 15:39:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2009 15:39:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 67531 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 15:39:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 67449 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 15:39:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 67438 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2009 15:39:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.151] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:02 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3536.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C43D41C00119 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3536.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 748B31C0011B for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx01.dev.local (unknown [91.109.129.122]) by mwinf3536.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CAB601C00119 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:39 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091217153839836.CAB601C00119@mwinf3536.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2E33259D for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mx01.dev.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uBgppkLHXON for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host47.msm.che.vodafone (host212-183-132-60.uk.access.vodafone.net [212.183.132.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928C03258F for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:01 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B2A5072.6000800@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:26 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [Tomcat6] Eclipse warnings References: <25aac9fc0912161231j601b88a3tc99b1cb9b68b059c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0912161231j601b88a3tc99b1cb9b68b059c@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16/12/2009 21:31, sebb wrote: > Eclipse generates many thousands of warnings for the Tomcat6 code. > > For example, over 2000 missing @Override markers, over 3000 "raw type" warnings. > > Is it the intention to fix these (eventually)? Speaking personally, I have no intention of spending any time on these at all. There are more important things to fix, like actual bugs, than these cosmetic changes. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org