Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37786 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 19:25:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 19:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 90214 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 19:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90132 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 19:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90117 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2009 19:25:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.191] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:47 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3618.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B39657000083 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3618.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A6DD0700008E for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx01.dev.local (unknown [91.109.129.122]) by mwinf3618.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7F5D27000083 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:25:24 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091214192524521.7F5D27000083@mwinf3618.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD5B3255A for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:48 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mx01.dev.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GC3ajNge3R3N for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAC6E32555 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:45 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B269114.6070205@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:25:08 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Problem using maven jspc plugin with tomcat 7 and jstl References: <4B2552A8.1010406@apache.org> <4E3BB38C-9CA7-4403-BA9E-56E18EC279DC@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4E3BB38C-9CA7-4403-BA9E-56E18EC279DC@yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14/12/2009 03:58, David Jencks wrote: > I can verify by experiment that the 2nd solution fixes the problem with > jspC. I agree that there's a strong case to be made for moving > DefaultJarScanner to org.apache.tomcat but doing so introduces a lot of > dependencies from that package to > > org.apache.tomcat.util.res.StringManager > org.apache.juli.logging.LogFactory > org.apache.catalina.startup.Constants > > I could resolve these but the results would probably not be consistent > with whatever policy tomcat has on dependencies. However if this would > be helpful I'll be happy to supply a patch. I'm in the middle of fixing this now. I'm going with option 2 since when I looked into the refactoring for option 1 last night there is more required than I really want to do at this stage of Tomcat 7 development. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org