Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84080 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2009 10:10:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2009 10:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 59199 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2009 10:10:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59113 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2009 10:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59102 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2009 10:10:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.190] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:10:06 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3633.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C8B71700008E for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:09:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3633.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BC0177000091 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:09:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx01.dev.local (unknown [91.109.184.51]) by mwinf3633.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9A374700008E for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:09:45 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091210100945631.9A374700008E@mwinf3633.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0DA3252E for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:09:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mx01.dev.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMVLhzW5jYxs for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62522324F4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B20C8D4.1030501@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:09:24 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 - META-INF/context.xml References: <4B1F057E.7040806@hanik.com> <4B1F74A6.8050004@apache.org> <4B1FAC84.8090405@hanik.com> <4B1FAED4.4000402@apache.org> <4B2003BE.5030701@hanik.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2003BE.5030701@hanik.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > On 12/09/2009 07:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> 6.0.x was inconsistent between WARs and directories. That was made >> consistent in 6.0.19. >> >> META-INF/context.xml in WAR files always extracts/copies >> META-INF/context.xml in a directory doesn't copy<6.0.19, does copy >> 6.0.19 onwards >> > Then I suggest making everything in TC 7 consistent with directories > <6.0.19 > > That's the whole point, it creates nothing but confusion to move the > file out, since it remains there and results in a failed deployment if > you remove a WAR file/directory while the server is not running So a host option extractContextXml that defaults to false? Works for me. I might even code it if I get a chance later today ;) Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org