Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60569 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 23:45:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 23:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26263 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 23:45:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 26192 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 23:45:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 23:45:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:45:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knst.kolinko@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.214] (HELO mail-fx0-f214.google.com) (209.85.220.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:45:27 +0000 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so6317828fxm.0 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:45:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BOHEolX6ccf8IUpLiqhyaffjJtdn0O4Qby0NF+wFpok=; b=NTeXA6zgJ0LCGXW4/eYZRIisoezxXm/Paj8aljStw/qfjUG/DHyeDqMq83vLUOyg3V wOcWVowg5cCAA3yU2dYMVrYuHjo4Kul1gdIcMoZ/dAOiISEdRuvfzVim2+5F92IdASO/ 3PcOW/3NxKzokepz6yV+1KfxsIngcY/k1wyF8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sHYwhuFfxALrbVqThFNejnl5RyAPfo7EhxrpzpvAl1/e6IlQDJAKWPv+YrgQ94xsl5 SUSwoI7OOoZgN/YXHQX/yvxLCp7quqvuDmvNddCuTiqt6Nc+x1ef2InlNWyYkui+Jbgw +mK8JoFqhPB3M4oZkPnij5bO0ME87nssB6R4w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.64.28 with SMTP id r28mr4514864muk.11.1261525506635; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:45:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B312B9F.7010107@apache.org> References: <4B30EFB5.8020507@gmail.com> <4B312B9F.7010107@apache.org> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:45:06 +0300 Message-ID: <427155180912221545w2a4e081r474a7e3fe2c37376@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2) From: Konstantin Kolinko To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/12/22 Mark Thomas : >(...) > Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the > patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before > the tag. > > Mark +1 to re-tag. And I would like the fix to 47413 to be included in it. Patch already proposed, though there might be comments. To be sure: while applying the patches, we are still updating the "6.0.21" section of changelog.xml? That is, everybody agrees that the next tag will be 6.0.21 again? I am +1 to drop the current TOMCAT_6_0_21/ and recreate it after the fixes are applied. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org