Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36152 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2009 18:30:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2009 18:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6113 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 18:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 6054 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 18:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 6043 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2009 18:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knst.kolinko@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.227] (HELO mail-fx0-f227.google.com) (209.85.220.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:30:01 +0000 Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so2098833fxm.41 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wU8X71h6z2MBLQEP7Mk/ub1JkakvLxeZiNpBCfGtkBM=; b=g/3dSg2J+3UaeHAjYKPRoY8nxEqzydhpu1NzKxhkb+ma4cCejSAToiM06LII4eA1Hq +1FM9IOhSBAhffHlzJrwJc2DKcHOAbD0/ya4djMfi+FgmhBRvDME/C601M2RizR6P1rz J3TWuMuJJ/hYM3y1D31fdm2uV9DxZ0xycyaGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cmINQkj0UDh35k5meSCIkcU4mZtEbUWD0MNVVyr21kYDtuNs4ZnUkxf8E+N60/5tEI eNSjcihUm79pX2EUEA/JDmLFga+aZraJbAi86y5QKRX26+IwWn187DW6x1m2+WSn1S+q QfuOnsm1oR8dL7UTCuuJcHoebLesj6tNqFMdo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.127.34 with SMTP id e34mr1864699mun.108.1254680921554; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC8A83C.1090308@kippdata.de> References: <4AC8A83C.1090308@kippdata.de> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:28:41 +0400 Message-ID: <427155180910041128p154b9eb1g143093ced8ff0482@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: tcnative in TC5.5: version properties From: Konstantin Kolinko To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/10/4 Rainer Jung: > b) filtering apr.properties and improving > the manifest A simple question: if you do filter apr.properties, what value you'll put there, and on what grounds? [cite of apr.properties] tcn.info=Tomcat Native/@VERSION@ [/cite] That value cannot be 1.1.something, because these sources are not on /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/ Regarding this question: > leveraging the existing targets in jni build.xml instead > of duplicating the effort in the main build.xml If jni build.xml is a copy of one in /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/, I would prefer to ignore it (and not use when building TC5.5 release), treating it as some legacy. Maybe even +1 to remove it, to lessen confusion. Regarding the future: I do not know, whether it is hard, and how interdependencies are, but maybe we can build and distribute "tomcat-apr.jar" as a part of the TC-Native release? And use the same pre-built jar for TC 5.5, 6.0 and 7.0 releases. Is it an optional jar, that can be removed by ones that do not have the native dll/so installed? (In TC 6.0 those classes are in tomcat-coyote.jar now). Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org