Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71847 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 18:30:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 18:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 30445 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30363 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30352 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.151] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:30:39 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3527.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D09601C00082 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3527.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BA5221C00083 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx01.dev.local (unknown [91.109.130.132]) by mwinf3527.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 712411C00082 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:30:18 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090917183018463.712411C00082@mwinf3527.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B0F3219E for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:30:18 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mx01.dev.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUKHgVyRrpAh for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:30:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.dev.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DC9532195 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:30:12 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4AB28022.2070609@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:29:54 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Bug workflow References: <4AB26264.805@cscc.de> <4AB26397.7080204@apache.org> <4AB26749.2020405@cscc.de> <4AB26F88.8040601@apache.org> <4AB27C98.1090605@cscc.de> In-Reply-To: <4AB27C98.1090605@cscc.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Uwe G�nther wrote: > So I wasn't so wrong with the first one. Unfortunately there was nothing > to code at all. > > So I am gonna go for some odd ones and go on with the good things to do. > > How does this work for non commiters; if they have a patch? Ok, 1st > attach the patch to the bug, 2nd...? Give the committers a couple of days or so to look at it. Drop a note to the dev list of it looks like it has been missed. It will either be applied and/or proposed as appropriate or you'll get some feedback on what needs improving. A couple of tips: - provide patches against trunk unless trunk isn't affected - provide patches in diff -u format - avoid having cosmetic changes and functional changes in the same patch Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org