Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44071 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:44:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 72695 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:44:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72624 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72613 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:44:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:44:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.192] (HELO mail-vw0-f192.google.com) (209.85.212.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:44:25 +0000 Received: by vwj30 with SMTP id 30so947720vwj.30 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:44:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CBLYDYhdyFeQVvJIkernJ3qj0jeuKTpw3c/SD544sWU=; b=cpb/RmPwMs4QW4SPJBq90/3lCBypW9kqNffIe8dFrX8ewExfbuara8YtIJTPSfGGL4 pa+iSTwVq0/QNH3tHMxvqjWWYgHmoRbBuEXYebPnYrC+4b4vq5D1d0lZPyFrheOyqcSq HNntbeT2B8O3JZwGi6hlw6yqKYvGFzMK1796w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MRVEZmmASmPqkzeJaUIDXDLzQvkACTbq8G2bZeAqdIwt/TcFqxb3zFajTV5NCkzQCV oP2IrhmUcGHhUijhEyRpFIJJnypXQnGMumNIQExygIJ8+5XRNOjQnNZCZ58v/+ZsEd2J Evz9qZjpSg5gtlaXFoGJcdyI/KoVcMrKjSmpU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.45.80 with SMTP id d16mr3784202vcf.93.1247273044679; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:44:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6A9F1ADC-4A18-42BD-B9D6-6B544A9C4E0B@yahoo.com> References: <06B32660-6BA6-4D88-AF76-99BB88ABFC44@yahoo.com> <4A57D64E.7060906@hanik.com> <6A9F1ADC-4A18-42BD-B9D6-6B544A9C4E0B@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:44:04 -0700 Message-ID: <96e4b5230907101744i17bb5a27n5a1bc64a7075b548@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Mavenized tomcat build From: Costin Manolache To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:19 PM, David Jencks wrote= : > > On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >> On 07/10/2009 05:19 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Jencks >>> =C2=A0wrote: >>> >>>> I am well aware that the tomcat developers regard ant as the one true >>>> build >>>> >>> >>> Having now used Maven 2.x for a couple of years, it Works. =C2=A0+1 for >>> trying it for Tomcat. >>> >> -1, my lunch is not long enough to download the internet ;) >> This discussion has been had many times, I've tried to look at it from >> many different perspectives, but have yet not seen a reason to switch. >> >> but we do publish our JARs to the Maven repo for other projects that are >> using Maven >> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tom= cat/ >> >> If Geronimo needs a better way to download and integrate Tomcat's JAR's >> lets focus on that, and not make this into another Maven vs ANT topic, c= ause >> I don't think that was the intention. > > I thought I made it pretty clear.... we need you to make a release from > trunk. =C2=A0Like I said its been more than 2 years since tomcat "accepte= d" the > annotations patch with no trunk release but general agreement that the pa= tch > couldn't go into the 6.0.x branch. I'm not familiar with the patch and the risks - but if a project depends on this and there are no good alternatives - maybe it can be revisited. I really don't get the point of your maven change - you seem to just move sources around in a separate repository with history, and the only reason is that maven doesn't support our layout ? I don't think ant is the only or best tool - I don't mind having maven build files - or Makefiles, jam or any other build tool as long as it doesn't force us to organize the source in its own way. Interdependencies and circular dependencies between packages can be better than all the breakups and duplication and tricks done to avoid them. Costin > > david jencks > >> >> Filip >> >>> Yoav >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org