Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90196 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 18:34:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 18:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 2927 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 18:34:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2845 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 18:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2834 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 18:34:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:34:44 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MNt1D-00016X-CN for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:34:23 -0700 Message-ID: <24360627.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:34:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Manu_SF To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Session replication without Apache In-Reply-To: <4A523548.3000308@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: rx8.yzf@gmail.com References: <24359544.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A523548.3000308@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Oh... Thanks, Mark. markt-2 wrote: > > Manu_SF wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a working "prototype" tomcat cluster with 2 worker nodes connected >> to >> Apache webserver as the Loadbalancer with mod_jk connectors. The session >> replication works like a charm with these 2 nodes. >> >> However, my ultimate goal is to deploy it over a system that does NOT >> have >> Apache (Instead has a Big-ip hardware loadbalancer). >> >> My question is - Is there a way to implement session replication on >> tomcat >> nodes without Apache? > > That would be a question for the users list. > > Mark > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Session-replication-without-Apache-tp24359544p24360627.html Sent from the Tomcat - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org