Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47124] Run the unit tests as part of the build!!!
In-Reply-To: <bug-47124-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47124-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20090505131208.4D8C3234C003@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Tue,  5 May 2009 06:12:07 -0700 (PDT)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47124


--- Comment #6 from Marc Guillemot <mguillemot@yahoo.fr>  2009-05-05 06:12:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Isn't it even more efficient if one committer (you?) just rename the files and
> > commit the changes?
> 
> Depends how you measure efficiency. It would be less work for me just to review
> a set of proposed changes.

if you know an easy way to generate the set of SVN commands, I'm interested.
Otherwise. due to the very small number of files impacted, it's better if you
do it directly. I've already provided a patch for that but you haven't applied
it.

> > this was in the proposed patch. Should I upload an other one?
> 
> There was a lot to the patch. Separating out the junit task (and checking that
> it still applies to the latest trunk) would be useful.
> 
> Re-opening so this doesn't get forgotten.

ok, I'll submit an other one just with this features

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org