Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90641 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2009 16:11:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2009 16:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 69264 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2009 16:11:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 69217 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2009 16:11:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 69198 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2009 16:11:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:11:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henri.gomez@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.164 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.164] (HELO mail-fx0-f164.google.com) (209.85.220.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:11:21 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so3502722fxm.41 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:11:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y+ne/KwlD36OtO9uN+ksnN8W9Pf09s0+7uRuVB2jKuU=; b=A+RIsRpnW/2gl2SAxtEa6kkoMTeIX5l79mqogPvQoainb75eWjgywP/vdfNiTqgRaY W9AGjl6I+e8k2Skt7qV6BfX2/ql3lFJf1lxxmmSId5rJ5NNO7597rm0jjpk+1Lq6JXqe MVzHfU1k7eH9Uy643/qqCrPefnWWhRZF4geSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lvHRpkEA2mr/zv7uxffEKaCNynD7WbCHe/cU1FMs57nulOtvJTTASrNFgBwZ5IvccM XNGJ1uE8TVV7KE+9vOeb4Hwv7/XkEAjFhYGnV0SiMVE+t/DTs1Wo8lbSmoluN+1EIGJ+ uzZPCu+xsgTNCblHtlUWdUaB5n2dwr1MX0CEw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.61.18 with SMTP id o18mr425796bkk.66.1236269461011; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:11:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <96e4b5230903050725x541db78dy6c4ed1c45e1113d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <49AF8C13.7000901@apache.org> <49AF9040.5040108@apache.org> <49AF954A.2090501@apache.org> <96e4b5230903050725x541db78dy6c4ed1c45e1113d1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: <6291fc850903050811j548c1974id75898898a173393@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Remove the jni worker from mod_jk From: Henri Gomez To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Please go ahead and remove it. > 10 years ago it seemed a good idea to avoid the IPC. Now it seems even > running them > on the same machine is obsolete. +1 The simpler the better and we're in cloud computing today :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org