Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-92245-apmail-tomcat-dev-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94294 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2008 12:52:01 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Oct 2008 12:52:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 78248 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2008 12:51:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78190 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2008 12:51:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78179 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2008 12:51:58 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:51:58 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of karl.sangabriel@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.142.189 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.142.189] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.189)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:50:46 +0000
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so809057tia.16
        for <dev@tomcat.apache.org>; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=cp3hn/LuP5+DHwPyfNLB1HYaZBfjkDX5TjIuLVW4w0I=;
        b=prS0AQ8L1mUqDwGE/T7gEzrYXaFVB6R62PoqdhnBIfcWSSLkld1ey987lipoEUe/jj
         YPRq2fNM9lk+U6g3Gh7BKULGvz7VHL8aZiv+Az+xTeKJuqodS+SZCd0QbgwaVyLlNHI8
         QrBdhpdzhKSiATKYDPFe8G3DOIVcN8xejI/LY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=hVhKk0Hpiv5TSHQj9NMNdzh+XPIuKUcmhh0N0AvPw0QmRGmaiAdOt1cCWp7GzzG88B
         L2NV1vPWR21qAIJy5Oz+5KA6ealgwl1+hSf24GDR7xu8hTIj8zt3mVIl96G1VLZRuTei
         QYmLX1k32cikwF9T96AY48wKlvyZV13EWFGlg=
Received: by 10.110.20.15 with SMTP id 15mr2068381tit.28.1224939084451;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (157.41.111.218.cbj02-home.tm.net.my
 [218.111.41.157])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm2396214tim.16.2008.10.25.05.51.22
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49031641.8030902@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:51:13 +0800
From: "Karl R. San Gabriel" <karl.sangabriel@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: EL keywords - not and empty - and EL functions
References: <490293C3.4050106@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <490293C3.4050106@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Karl R. San Gabriel wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Good day! I am a new guy and still adjusting to the TC project. :-)
>
> I have noticed the fixes you wanted to put in to TC 6.0.18 for bug 
> 46084 (duplicate of 45511) .
>
>        https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46084
>              https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> The ways the keywords "not" and "empty" (in duplicate bugs)  were used 
> in JSP files were like EL functions.
> EL functions are different. They are static methods from Java classes 
> made exposed via the <function> XML tag in the TLD file.
>
> TLD file:
> ...
> <uri>FunctionNot</uri>
>    <function>
>       <name>doItNow</name>
>       <function-class>Fully qualified class name</functon-class>
>       <function-signature>void doItNow()</function-signature>
>    </function>
> ...
>
> When we use "not" in the ff way:
>
>         ${not(true)}
>
> we are using it as an *EL function name* (because no whitespace(s) 
> between "not" and "(" ).
> It should not work because there is no declaration in the TLD for that 
> EL function "not".
> Thus, the exceptions (please see desciptions of  bugs 46084 and 45511).
>
> Regards,
> Karl San Gabriel
>
>
Pardon me. I was talking nonsense. :-)
Yeah, I tried ${not(true)} in JBoss and it works.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org