Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <48F4B9BD.4060800@kippdata.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:45 +0200
From: Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: JK 1.2.27-dev snapshot
References: <48F31BF5.7090801@apache.org> <48F4AC0F.1050203@kippdata.de>
 <48F4B820.4080609@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <48F4B820.4080609@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mladen Turk schrieb:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> I like the idea of thoroughly testing snapshots before tagging, because
>> although version numbers are cheap (in subversion), user confusion also
>> easily arises from "missing" (i.e. non-released) versions.
>
> 
> Sounds reasonable. I'll prepare the new snapshot with full set
> of binaries by tomorrow. I have nothing to commit, so lets
> push for testing.
> Think we could put it inside tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist
> instead some /~user/

That's OK as long as the file names indicate it's a snapshot. The
jkrelease.sh lets you do a release type tarball from trunk and it will
contain automatically the subversion revision in the tarball name.

If you are short on time, I can prepare the snapshot this evening, but
would prefer you to build the win binaries, because I don't have an old
MS compiler. If you want me to do the snapshot, send a short message,
otherwise I'll wait for you and work on something else.

Regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org