Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59976 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2008 13:12:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2008 13:12:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 55607 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 13:12:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55564 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 13:12:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55553 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2008 13:12:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:12:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.159] (HELO smtp5.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:11:03 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 24C0D1C00084 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:11:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.157.243]) by mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 03B101C00082 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:11:26 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20081002131126151.03B101C00082@mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169A41A44D3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:11:21 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJp6UpZoKl9t for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:11:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (study01.dev.local [192.168.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CBF11A420A for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:11:12 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48E4C868.7060407@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:11:04 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r701093 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt References: <20081002115008.E2E0723889FC@eris.apache.org> <1222950712.8015.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1222950712.8015.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:50 +0000, markt@apache.org wrote: >> Author: markt >> Date: Thu Oct 2 04:50:08 2008 >> New Revision: 701093 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=701093&view=rev >> Log: >> Withdraw patch for further work > > Even if it did not cause any regressions, why was it proposed ? Because it is a bug and there is no other release branch to propose it for. What is the point of users reporting bugs and us fixing them if we have no plans to include the fix in a release branch? > It is a > minor issue (the guy who is impacted by that should consider packaging > his application properly), There is nothing to say you can't use symlinks for libraries. I wouldn't package my app that way but if we are going to have an allowLinking attribute then we should make sure it actually works. and the patch changes something which is used > in many places Indeed. That is a reason to fix it rather than to leave it in my view. > (it likely makes listing folders an order of magnitude > slower). Directory listings are already horribly slow. There is a patch in BZ to cache them which claims significant improvements. > Tomcat 6.0 is supposed to be a stable branch, so I don't see how > everything can be backported. Until there is an alternative release branch, I don't see how every bug fix can not be backported. Tomcat 7 will be driven by the 3.0 spec timetable. You are on the EG, what are the plans for 3.0? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org