Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6866 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 13:42:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 13:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 58311 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 13:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 58263 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 13:42:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 58252 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 13:42:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:42:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.152] (HELO smtp5.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:41:07 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AD6891C00088 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:41:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.147.51]) by mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 97B7F1C00084 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:41:28 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080918134128621.97B7F1C00084@mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0307D1A4460 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:41:30 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vNEmgKCmGrOw for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:41:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (study01.dev.local [192.168.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F62E1A4064 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:41:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48D25A7C.7090101@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:41:16 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt References: <20080918124959.C4E99238889E@eris.apache.org> <1221743268.3156.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1221743268.3156.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +0000, markt@apache.org wrote: >> + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the >> + same EL related failures we have without the patch. I'll >> + look into them as separate issues. > > I fixed these by regenerating with a newer javacc and usage of the > lookahead flag (3 looked sensible). Don't know which one actually fixed > the problem. So how come those changes haven't been checked back in to svn? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org