Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49132 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2008 20:39:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2008 20:39:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 45408 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2008 20:38:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 45364 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2008 20:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 45353 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2008 20:38:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:38:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.158] (HELO smtp1.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:38:02 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3018.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C44C67000084 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.159.158]) by mwinf3018.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AFCA57000082 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:38:17 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080802203817720.AFCA57000082@mwinf3018.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C651121C9 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:31:34 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server02.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WTJcgHW4-reN for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:31:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (study01.dev.local [192.168.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07A771120EE for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:31:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4894C5AF.6010001@apache.org> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:38:07 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: AW: JspValueExpression behavior different References: <000501c8f4cd$b998a1c0$2cc9e540$@schneeberger@liwest.at> <4894AA10.9060001@apache.org> <000001c8f4dd$90513510$b0f39f30$@schneeberger@liwest.at> In-Reply-To: <000001c8f4dd$90513510$b0f39f30$@schneeberger@liwest.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Arnold Schneeberger wrote: > Is there a workaround - or what you mean with "probably a bug" I mean that if the behaviours are different, at least one implementation has a bug. From a quick scan, it looks like Tomcat is in the wrong but I haven't looked at it in any detail. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org