tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jess Holle <>
Subject Re: mod_proxy_balancer issue
Date Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:52:08 GMT
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Jess Holle wrote:
>> P.S. I'd also like to quiet attempts to recover workers from errors 
>> to a lower (and by default unlogged) logging level.  The transition 
>> of a worker into an error state should certainly be logged, but 
>> logging every time we find it to still be in an error state seems to 
>> be excessive -- at least for a sparsely populated port bank use case.
> Everything you said is fine with me. I just did a functional
> logic via watchdog thread and two basic use cases (maintain
> and keepalive). The keepalive is meant to deal with firewalls
> that tends to cut inactive connections.
> As far as I'm concerned feel free to extend the logic so
> it can deal with error states more intelligently.
> ... and of course, the plan is to implement something or
> all of this to mod_proxy, but using a different mechanism.
> Many modules needs some sort of out of the request cycle
> detached maintenance, so I'll add a common mpm maintenance
> thread to lower down the resource usage.
Do you have any /rough/ ideas of the timeframe in which you might get 
such a thread into mod_proxy?

Obviously I can start on mod_jk first.

Jess Holle

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message