Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24578 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2008 23:27:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 23:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 19002 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2008 23:27:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 18944 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2008 23:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 18933 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2008 23:27:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:27:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.152] (HELO smtp5.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:26:46 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3422.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 903F41C00086 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:26:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.152.208]) by mwinf3422.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 455651C00081 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:26:57 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080726232657284.455651C00081@mwinf3422.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3B01124AA for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:21:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server02.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZgItUxSlSgy for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:21:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (study01.dev.local [192.168.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24D10112483 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:21:06 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <488BB2B7.8080806@apache.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:26:47 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] bayeux inclusion References: <48861625.8040602@hanik.com> <96e4b5230807221348j77bbfd08if476291c62800d22@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <96e4b5230807221348j77bbfd08if476291c62800d22@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Costin Manolache wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists < > devlists@hanik.com> wrote: > >> As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit >> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 >> >> I think this toolkit should >> >> [X] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested >> [ ] 0 sounds interesting >> [ ] -1 throw it away >> >> I plan to put it under >> >> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/cometd/bayeux >> >> thinking that there may be more cometd components in the future > > > I don't know about this - don't you think we have too many svn trees ? Is > there any reason for this ? > I wouldn't mind having it in the trunk. Not in the java/ dir, but maybe > some extensions/bayeux ? I agree we have (in the past) had too many svn trees. I would much prefer that this went into trunk/java. As long as it is in it's own package, it is easy to include/exclude from the main distro. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org