Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31222 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2008 17:47:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2008 17:47:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 66493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2008 17:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 65592 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2008 17:47:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 65581 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2008 17:47:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:47:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:46:20 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so770159nfb.44 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:46:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=oeBq/bkmpXlVW6oVqATQGyHvjRGyF4q2+LcBddAGYiE=; b=xLdxrqTLw36F+FiytA9HasT/lk6zR3wKMiaIiECZ5xrbe0tVMjGBs3wbslJryjUl+xTRch2JvVC+UHHJMhsp4obm91bxvDlUA4z4PlVWCExLV+Rs3BEwwd79JXT1wD8r8g2Mp9vDA/fz2m/1t2oa9+OAVi9a8eB36fpozuYLZKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ILF5av1lnN2atq1WIe165kDdMBVrzqJGioda8hJq0WcH0Eed/uMT/I4nMOPuGQ7nho3oYOC7nPC+x1uL8FREvstj3JPI9tF30lDkdCaZJ2YBUX6bhhT8ryLSJ7UCWekXnNsNd5GbXLkrmSxMMffs8nThyeyjBBpFu2Xw/+IuCtQ= Received: by 10.82.121.20 with SMTP id t20mr40645buc.48.1208885983625; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.100.3 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <96e4b5230804221039j10756f1am17be197233d2b71a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:39:43 -0700 From: "Costin Manolache" Reply-To: costin@apache.org To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: Re: Osgifing Tomcat In-Reply-To: <6291fc850804220345w746f8b5cwc98eba9fbc5bcb14@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6291fc850804220345w746f8b5cwc98eba9fbc5bcb14@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think OSGI has some good ideas - it is pretty good at handling class loaders and loading/unloading modules. On the other side, they are very 'framework' - and like all other frameworks you have to do all things their way and they re-invent a lot of wheels ( from logging APIs to almost everything else ). If we could stick to the core - i.e. module loading/unloading - it wouldn't be bad. I did a quick search for OSGI implementations with apache license - and it looks there is even an apache project, felix... Costin On 4/22/08, Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi to all, > > Did there is plans, ideas or interest around about OSGI-fing Tomcat ? > > Regards > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org