Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27731 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2008 02:46:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2008 02:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 55219 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2008 02:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55161 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2008 02:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55150 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2008 02:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 55147 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2008 02:46:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:46:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:46:22 +0000 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id CA73B71406E; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:46:29 -0800 (PST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44383] - Possible leak: tomcat does not release Jasper compilation contexts In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20080210024629.CA73B71406E@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:46:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44383 ------- Additional Comments From diosnoes@hotmail.com 2008-02-09 18:46 ------- Maybe it is not a leak in the sense of unlimited growth because they are -maybe- unreferenced -and substituted- in the next compilation of the JSP (I don't know). Let's say it could be a big bunch of unneeded objects. Do you mean that you have not found the class of objects I mention? If not, I understand that I must provide a verifiable test case. But if you have found those objects, do you think it is ok, provided they are only needed to compile JSPs?? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org