Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18366 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2008 16:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2008 16:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 90312 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2008 16:59:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90256 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2008 16:59:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90245 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2008 16:59:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:59:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.64] (HELO smtp7-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:58:49 +0000 Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14C03227ED for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:59:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (lap34-1-82-224-140-72.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.140.72]) by smtp7-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13FF3227EE for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:59:09 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Cookies are broken in 6.0.16? From: Remy Maucherat To: Tomcat Developers List In-Reply-To: <47AF29DC.4000207@manico.net> References: <5245102a0802082243u1c75eb0fl77dee2f5e5d45ad7@mail.gmail.com> <47ADA4AC.2080302@apache.org> <1202596086.4884.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47AE33D5.3000301@hanik.com> <1202604089.4884.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47AE55D5.70608@hanik.com> <47AE5DF4.2070704@manico.net> <47AE6F96.6010400@hanik.com> <47AED113.3080907@apache.org> <47AEE263.8000704@apache.org> <47AF29C9.1030303@hanik.com> <47AF29DC.4000207@manico.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:59:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1202662749.3338.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-1.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 11:44 -0500, Jim Manico wrote: > Filip - you are 100% correct on this thread. Are you basically the > traffic cop guarding the core of Tomcat? I understand, you are not impacted by the behavior change, and as a result this allows you to be "fair", I suppose. The issue is that the behavior of Tomcat has been different, in all prior releases, and changing it of all a sudden without any configuration capability because it feels nice to play "spec lawyer" is wrong to me. Similar decisions have been made in the past, and this did cause problems, it's simply faster to add the appropriate options right away. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org