tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44454] - busy count reported in mod_jk inflated, causes incorrect balancing
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:01:33 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44454>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44454





------- Additional Comments From anoonan@indeed.com  2008-02-20 16:01 -------
Well, I'm not 100% sure what you mean by related to the apache graceful/restart.
 When we do a graceful (don't really do restarts because of the live nature),
the counts do seem to reset, so I don't *think* there's a problem there.  I
don't see any segfaults in the log, just junk like "request failed: error
reading the headers" from crappy bots and script kiddies.  Also, I just started
looking through the code and it seems like the difference between the optimistic
locking and pessimistic locking is just that the pessimistic locking just does
the same locking/unlocking sequence in more places, is that right?  I'm not a C
programmer by any stretch of the imagination.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message