tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44349] - mod_jk/1.2.26 module does not read worker.status.sticky_session_force property correctly
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:02:58 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349





------- Additional Comments From rainer.jung@kippdata.de  2008-02-06 13:02 -------
The file contains sticky_session_force=0 (False/Off).
Can you confirm, that the file belongs to the startup test which logged
sticky_session_force=True, i.e. it's timestamp and PID are OK? I want to exclude
the possibility, that we are talking about a stale file.

I'll now think about ways, how the wrong information could get into the shm file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message