tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44349] - mod_jk/1.2.26 module does not read worker.status.sticky_session_force property correctly
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:08:59 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349





------- Additional Comments From amz_sid@trashmail.net  2008-02-04 05:08 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I tested Apache/2.0.52 with mod_jk/1.2.22 and it picked up the property setting
> > correctly. 
> 
> Please ignore this last comment as I had checked the behaviour only and not the
> JK Status console with mod_jk/1.2.22.  It still behaves incorrectly in that it
> has sticky_session_force=True but when one of the servers is down with a session
> already established it loadbalances to the other server causing errors in our
> application because we do not have the original session.  Please note that we do
> not require session replication switched on.

I have just checked the JK Status Console for mod_jk/1.2.22 and low and behold
it does not show the sticky_session_force property as True even though it has
been configured.  Has this ever worked?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message