Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83236 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 65698 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2008 08:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 64817 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2008 08:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 64775 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2008 08:29:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:29:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.97.136.177] (HELO n068.sc1.he.tucows.com) (64.97.136.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:29:13 +0000 Received: from sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769316E006706CA for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:29:05 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,0823a7ced783e000,0391bd0b1b8a2c95,markt@apache.org,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:599:601:854:945:946:988:989:1042:1187:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1358:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3027:3352:3865:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3874:4250:4470:5007:6119:7652,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [64.97.206.40]) (Authenticated sender: med.thomas) by sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <478C6ED1.5030604@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:29:05 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Native 1.1.12 release References: <478BFE9D.2080800@apache.org> <478C0080.40407@apache.org> <478C6BE1.6030008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <478C6BE1.6030008@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jean-frederic clere wrote: > I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not > mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat. > > tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means they may > not be available for download in the ASF site. But that doesn't prevent > us from releasing tcnative sources. > > tcnative is not very visible and I am +1 for changing this. (updating > site and tc build). This is my preferred option. There would also need to be a release vote for all the src distros on a.o/dist. If there is some show stopper issue with releasing native separately that I haven't seen, then I am happy as the svn solution as an alternative. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org