Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15
From: Remy Maucherat <remm@apache.org>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1194720097.4722.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1194272254.3313.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1194624576.3048.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <4734C022.9040800@apache.org>
	 <1194646614.7603.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <4734DDFA.9010605@apache.org>
	 <1194720097.4722.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:11:14 +0100
Message-Id: <1195229474.3063.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > These sources can be found in the specification documents.
> > That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
> > 
> > > Geronimo
> > > should also have the same files somewhere.
> > 
> > I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch for
> > 6.0.16 that uses whatever they use.
> 
> There's also the option of not shipping those files, it would only
> remove (until the user adds an official jar somewhere) validation
> capabilities for the newest webapps.
> 
> So, the possibilities are:
> 1) Add a CDDL xsd
> 2) Remove xsd
> 3) Use some binary from somewhere

Since this issue is now resolved (along with the cookie issue), I would like to tag a new Tomcat build shortly (preferably not including tons of new patches, otherwise there could be new regressions).

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org