Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31456 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2007 22:04:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2007 22:04:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 5356 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2007 22:04:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 5305 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2007 22:04:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 5294 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2007 22:04:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:04:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.22.94.67] (HELO virtual.halosg.com) (72.22.94.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:04:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 17991 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2007 17:00:39 -0500 Received: from 63-225-250-21.hlrn.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.0.7?) (63.225.250.21) by halosg.com with SMTP; 17 Oct 2007 17:00:39 -0500 Message-ID: <471686A9.4050004@hanik.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:03:21 -0600 From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2? References: <73fce4c20710171321v474dee41i69b477cc47dcef95@mail.gmail.com> <1192657318.3259.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1192657318.3259.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote: > >> It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven >> users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully >> use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of >> switching Tomcat's build process within the 6.0.x or possibly 7.0 >> release schedule. Please use this thread to voice your opinion. Reply >> to this message with any comments, and/or simple votes for or against >> the migration to Maven 2. >> > > I don't think this work is acceptable in 6.0.x. > to elaborate more for you, 6.0.x is our current 6.0 release branch. We are using RTC, Review-Then-Commit policy here, and introducing maven into a stable release branch like this, is probably not the best idea. What you should focus your proposal on, is our "trunk" that doesn't yet exist. Once we have a trunk, ideas and contributions get discussed and added there, then they can be suggested for a back port. At this moment, we don't have a trunk, but you can assume that there will be one --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org