Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <46F1DE56.8030703@rowe-clan.net>
References: <46F010DB.6000704@apache.org> <46F07D29.5060006@hanik.com>
 <46F0C723.5070305@gmail.com> <46F0DAAB.2020908@apache.org>
 <46F0E4EE.6050606@gmail.com> <46F12965.2080404@hanik.com>
 <fcslq1$3l5$1@sea.gmane.org> <46F1DE56.8030703@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <56B3BC60-795C-4BBF-AD1B-7B996B2A8E5C@jaguNET.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Review model take 2
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:58:26 -0400
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>


On Sep 19, 2007, at 10:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>
> If Joe says "this feature isn't going to be acceptable because Y",  
> well
> then there isn't much to discuss at that point, and it probably  
> should be
> backed out right away while the basic idea is debated.
>

Certainly it depends on what "Y" is though.

If "Y" is 'it breaks the servlet spec' then yeah.
If "Y" is 'I really don't like this because I think it's
stupid' then it's a whole different ball of wax.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org