tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:12:49 GMT
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> 
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> How about:
>>>
>>>    o CTR on trunk
>>>
>>>    o Various release branches are made (ala httpd, apr, etc...).
>>>      These include a STATUS file.
>>>
>>>    o All code applied to the release branch is under
>>>      lazy consensus but *must* be specified in STATUS.
>>>      (eg: "I plan on applying rev786987 in 3 days under
>>>      lazy consensus").
>>>
>>> Not as stringent as RTC, but also provides a good level
>>> of oversight with a minimum of overhead... RTC can be
>>> maintained for older, stable releases.
>>
>> Still -1.
>>
>> It provides no more oversight than RTC

Sorry my bad - I meant CTR here.

My point is that your less stringent proposal provides additional
overhead over CTR but no extra oversight / benefit.

> I have no idea how you could possibly justify that statement.
> With RTC one *requires* 3 +1 votes. The above does not.
> 
> And STATUS is there to indicate what *will* be done, not
> what *has* been done.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message