tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)
Date Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:19:00 GMT
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >    [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
> >            as well as the problems which started this whole
> >            thing.
> >    [ ]  0. Whatever.
> >    [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
> 
> My proposal was to put the principles forward clearly:
> - core changes need to be discussed beforehand
> - calls for review (or vetoes, which in the end are sometimes very 
> similar) should be considered rather than exclusively spend time to 
> determine if they are legitimate
> 

See the bulleted EMail which was in response to Tim's
request :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message