Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12398 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2007 15:43:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2007 15:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 95493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 15:43:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 95454 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2007 15:43:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 95443 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2007 15:43:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:43:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.95.77] (HELO smtp114.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.95.77) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:43:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 51602 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2007 15:43:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:X-Priority:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=JyjwMAnlLTa2jdgUYHgyGa30GR5T7tFJITf6JAh4v8ZvyK7+JKbKV+CU2A8Ie8kioRVBmavvdcvuh4P0qwhj30Dg6B+rslT3wv0FJ6zK4+MLTCmrFIcrW9FuYXpB3FvxvLjOz39CHHD1ffimYuQVttwpgd/aRBNL4y27BobjuEE= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.106?) (david_jencks@67.102.173.8 with plain) by smtp114.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2007 15:43:00 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: jhjTGAMVM1m6jpfhzhpfyNh_TXiL8.AVvuBJToNEKVsP9_.gNSCMHNyuyXGTRgyuqFdnC0Wihg-- In-Reply-To: <19435.65.90.33.17.1187795177.squirrel@mail.tmorton.com> References: <20070813181349.791471A981A@eris.apache.org> <46CB7DD5.5010107@apache.org> <46CB86FC.2080406@rowe-clan.net> <46CC4C9C.1080100@apache.org> <19435.65.90.33.17.1187795177.squirrel@mail.tmorton.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:43:00 -0700 To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:06 AM, funkman@joedog.org wrote: >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >> Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy >> campers >> (2 of them which don't contribute much, as far as I know), and the >> rest >> of the committers are either do not care or are unhappy. Most also >> want >> a change in the development process, and as long as there's >> agreement on >> that and it respects the ASF principles, we should be able to do >> that. >> > > > Bah. In neither angry nor happy. > > My impression was trunk was going to be wacky new stuff which broke > existing api's and configurations with 6.0. Much like 5.0 --> 5.5. > > In reality that didn't happen - we just got some comet changes. > (I'm not > saying this is good or bad - it's just and observation) While it's more fun to watch from the sidelines, I'm afraid I'll have to get involved here to point out that you are wrong about this. trunk contains an entirely new and incompatible with 6.0.x annotation processing framework which is in use in the Geronimo integration. Remy suggested and I agreed that it would not be appropriate for an api change of this magnitude to go in a 6.0.x revision. While Remy was certainly the committer most involved in applying these changes, IIRC there was some support from at least one other committer. In Geronimo we are anxiously awaiting an official tomcat release with these agreed upon api changes, so we tend to view the proposal eliminate trunk with some concern. thanks david jencks > > Now we are in a technical debate between comet implementation > between Remy > and Filips "designs". This has seemed to migrate into a personal > attack in > a subtle manner. > > Such is life when coding. Disagreements occur, feeling are hurt and > email > is the worst method of communicating an emotional topic since words > are > amplified. (Sometime on purpose, other times by accident). > > My hope is this too shall pass and all is good again. > > Personally - I am not very clueful on comet other than the basics. I'd > love to get the clue - but I can't find and work related projects to > justify the time. That leaves me out in the cold due to this > conversation. > I feel any vote by me would be a bad vote because of my ignorance > on the > topic. It seems others are in the same situation. > > All that being said - I'd love to see Remy and Filip agree on comet > and > remove trunk. It would be a shame to see either leave due to these > disputes. > > > -Tim > (Away for training in Boston this week (Kendall Square)) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org