Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46CB548F.3060908@hanik.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:09:35 -0600
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <devlists@hanik.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox
References: <20070813181349.791471A981A@eris.apache.org>
 <fabbh8$2gb$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fabbh8$2gb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

for those not following the entire non existent revolution, here is the 
veto that was being debated

fhanik@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Tue May 29 15:23:36 2007
> New Revision: 542678
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=542678
> Log:
> setup default operation
>
> Modified:
>     tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java
>
> Modified: 
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java?view=diff&rev=542678&r1=542677&r2=542678 
>
> ============================================================================== 
>
> --- 
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java 
> (original)
> +++ 
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java 
> Tue May 29 15:23:36 2007
> @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@
>      public CometEventImpl(Request request, Response response) {
>          this.request = request;
>          this.response = response;
> +        try {
> +            this.register(CometOperation.OP_READ);
> +        }catch ( IOException x ) {
> +            throw new IllegalStateException(x.getMessage(),x);
> +        }
>      }

To keep with the proper commit handling procedures of the ASF, I think I 
have to veto all these changes, so that they are not considered as 
having been accepted inside an official branch. They have to be 
considered a proposal (even though the branch they live in sounds 
official), but of course, no need to revert them.

R�my


Bill Barker wrote:
> I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all.  I'm 
> backing Remy's suggestion to send the current trunk to the sandbox:
> [ ] +1 Let's end the revolution
> [ ] +0 What revolution?
> [ ] -1 Viva the revolultion
>
> My vote is +1.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org