On Aug 2, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> And in fact it doesn't matter. I found it more logical, to have
> JK_STATUS_ERROR and JK_STATUS_FATAL_ERROR closer together (for
> those reading the code). The constants are not used outside JK, so
> there is no compatibility problem.
>
> It looks like your are closely following todays JK changes. I
> really appreciate that! Unless you find problems, I just now
> commited my last change (hopefully) for 1.2.25.
A other little nit: The see a few places where
we have things like (in jk_lb_worker.c for example):
&(p->lb_workers[0].s->route[0])
Can't they simply be reduced to
p->lb_workers[0].s->route
?
Not exactly sure what I'm missing there...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
|